Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN

Danny, you have progressed. I seem to remember you were a supporter of Scalia’s dissent in Lawrence which foretold the fedguv intrusion in to all manner of things it had no powers at all according to the US Constitution. Is my memory correct?


23 posted on 04/14/2016 7:04:43 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

see 22, and yes I support Scalia’s dissent. I’ve long thought that we need a Federal defense of marriage amendment.

And one merely need to look at the current battle line of Transgender’s use of opposite sex bathrooms to realize how far down the slippery slope we are.

That case has nothing to do with Cruz’s defense of the state ban on sex toys.


25 posted on 04/14/2016 7:08:28 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: jwalsh07

see 22, and yes I support Scalia’s dissent. I’ve long thought that we need a Federal defense of marriage amendment.

And one merely need to look at the current battle line of Transgender’s use of opposite sex bathrooms to realize how far down the slippery slope we are.

That case has nothing to do with Cruz’s defense of the state ban on sex toys.


26 posted on 04/14/2016 7:08:28 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson