[nathanbedford]

Prove the money exists first

Hello? That is not how the system works. Every state has laws defining the burden of the fiduciary of any charity to make a clear and complete accounting. Your suggestion that some private citizen has to prove up the money that Donald Trump controls is utterly absurd. He is the one who controls it, he is the one, the only one who has the capacity to render an accounting.

The burden is on Trump as it is with every fiduciary to come forward and make a complete accounting of what came in and what went out. In effect, the fiduciary has the obligation to prove his innocence.

[arl295]

Hey, did you know that the donations were pledges? And the money he received was dispersed to the list of charities he posted.

So yes, if the pledge money does not show up, it isn't "stolen". You can't steal something that does not exist. And according to our Constitution, you are innocent, until proven guilty.

So again, PROVE THE MONEY EXISTS FIRST

[usafa92]

Seriously, the lunacy of a guy who goes around this board posting a picture of Nathan Bedford Forrest while continually condemning Trump for any and all transgressions. And anyone should take your opinion seriously?

[usafa92]

Yes, and I’ve read your 10 page screed on how you picked your username. Whatever.