I'd say that is an "it depends" issue. If one follows the constitution and precedent, you are correct. If one ignores the constitution and precedent (which is garden variety common), then the conclusion is incorrect.
“If one ignores the constitution and precedent (which is garden variety common), then the conclusion is incorrect.”
Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court can pretend and legislate that the Sun orbits the Earth, that Anthropogenic Carbon dioxide emissions cause Climate Change, that a mud puddle in a driveway is a Federal waterway, that King Canute really did have the power to command the tide to reverse direction, that Congress has the Constitutional enumerated power to command the purchase of health insurance, that Obama is a natural born citizen with a an underage U.S. mother and a Communist Kenyan father, a Yellow Dog is more suitable than a Human Republican candidate for President, or a naturalized U.S. citizen is a natural born U.S. citizen; but all their pretending will not change the fact Ted Cruz was a Canadian citizen, born abroad, born without a U.S. citizen father, and is not eligible no matter how much they claim it to be so and act as if it were so.
.