A Toast to Scott Walker: Conservative Batman

The Resurgent ^ | 3/29/2016 | David Scharoun

[conservativejoy]

I was never a Walker supporter, but when he did the right thing by exiting the race, he earned my respect. If Rubio, Kasich, and Bush had been as honest, this race would be entirely different now.

[Gaffer]

So....like, uhhhhh........THIS is the site that just got $3 million from an ANTI-TRUMP PAC, right? I just want to be sure.

[mouse1]

He dropped out because he couldn’t afford to continue. Nothing noble about that.

[ScottinVA]

Everyone remained steadfastly confident that Trump’s campaign was a circus sideshow, an entertaining, reality TV fever dream that we would all eventually wake up from.

Oh, it still is... it's only a matter of whether it ends in August or November.

[afraidfortherepublic]

Reprise of Scott Walker’s reasons for his early exit from the Presidential campaign.

FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.

[Menthops]

Walker is GOPe - part of the same establishment of Ryan, Priebus, Rove, and Romney.

Walker failed to follow through Wisconsin job creation promises, Wisconsin’s economic performance really does not differ much from neighboringo Democratic Minnesota, and he is not very popular in the state.

Let’s not let whatever animuses people have against Donald Trump lead to an all of the sudden love affair with the GOPe and its pols.

[conservativejoy]

We could probably have some real fun naming all the internet sites that have been bought and paid for this election.

[MNJohnnie]

You Erick, “where incompetence meets arrogance”, Erickson, how much did the GOPE pay you for this fluff job?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3415485/posts

Erick Erickson Website “Resurgent” Paid By Pro-Cruz/Anti-Trump “Our Principles PAC”

[GBA]

See ya, Scott. You've accomplished a great deal and you had promise for a bright future.

Fortunately, your timing has been perfect this election. Thanks for coming out.

[MNJohnnie]

Difference between Erickson, and the other websites, is Erickson postures as an “anti Establishment Grass roots activist” while being bankrolled by the GOPE. It is false advertising at best.

[Daveinyork]

Whoever opposes Trump is GOPe?

[gorush]

You said something nice about Scott Walker! I’m headin’ to the window to watch for flying pigs. :{)

[Salgak]

Really ? A politician deciding to stop, when there was no more money ? Heck, that’s about as unusual as it gets. . .

[conservativejoy]

LOL! I like pink flying pigs best.:)

[Jane Long]

Erick Erickson Website “Resurgent” Paid By Pro-Cruz/Anti-Trump “Our Principles PAC”

Yep....no bias there!! LOLOL.

No thanks!!

[mouse1]

The only reason Walker accomplished what he did was because of republican state senate majority. He failed Wisconsin because he put his own political ambitions and his big money backers ahead of the great people of this state. At some point, in what could have been a once in a lifetime politician, he sold out. Shame

[MNJohnnie]

Difference between Erickson, and the other websites, is Erickson postures as an “anti Establishment Grass roots activist” while being bankrolled by the GOPE. It is false advertising at best.

[joe fonebone]

Nice rhetoric....please provide some facts to go with it

[Dr. Sivana]

So....like, uhhhhh........THIS is the site that just got $3 million from an ANTI-TRUMP PAC, right? I just want to be sure.

Yup. As far as I know, the writers aren't misrepresenting their opinions. We are all free to agree or rebut as we see fit. It could be worse, the anti-trump ads might have given us $3 million dollars of TV and rdaio ads to annoy us throughout the day. This way, you can skip the article without risking missing your program. Don't worry, Trump has earned many friends to get his point of view disseminated as well.