Posted on 03/29/2016 4:41:08 PM PDT by Signalman
Or Rush is smart and realizes further pushing this story only hurts both Trump and Cruz, one of which is going to be the eventual nominee.
“I doubt it’s a total fabrication. The National Enquirer learned its lesson when Carol Burnett sued their heads off years ago.”
So the stories the Enquirer ran in 2008 about Sarah Palin’s affairs are true?
“I think the swing states are the states we should look at as it is those what decide the election and cruz has done awful in them, and will give the election to Clinton.”
Exactly!
OH, PA, FL,
It’s very simple:
Which candidate has the best chance in those states?
#197 you moron it has been pointed out to you before the PAC. Was and is not under Cruz’s control. Care to post any questions you claim the FEC asked Cruz about it? Hell no, you can’t because you are a fraud.
But as you already know that because your intent is to smear and intentionally lie!
Far more likely that Rush, having been on the receiving end of baseless smears like these, knows bullshit when he sees it.
There are several 2010 sifn ups working hard on these threads, from both sides, stirring up as much nasty emoption as they can. It is happening all over the Internet. The DNC and globalist oligarchy do not sleep. Evil never does.
It took me exactly 5 seconds to find out that Heidi’s posted on Twitter today and is campaigning in Wisconsin. WTH is wrong with people on FR? You’re lying when you say she’s “gone”, “off Twitter” and “left him.”
He is not a republican - he is a theocratic totalitarian.
The dirt diggers in the media's politics of personal destruction smear machine promised us both nude pictures of Melania Trump and a sex tape with Amanda Carpenter in it.
Now we find that they cannot deliver the goods because no pics or vids seem to exist
This is totally unforgivable of them
I feel so lied to
“You’re lying when you say she’s “gone”, “off Twitter” and “left him.”
Those people don’t give two sh*ts about the truth. It’s all about pressing their pet narrative.
Well it is actually close to the idea of “malice aforethought”, but the standard for public figures in libel cases is “actual malice” and has been since NY Times v Sullivan back in the 60’s.
Malice aforethought is an antiquated mens rea (requisite mental state) element for murder. Modern criminal codes have mostly done away with that term, though a few states may still use it.
If there is no substance to the accusations floated in the NE, not only Cruz but all the females impugned have millions of NE dollars in their future and an army of lawyers who will beg for the lawsuits.
Cat got your tongue?
I wouldn't, but I think some people might.
Can’t speak for you, but that wouldn’t influence many people.
Maybe not millions, but I do think it would influence some.
I doubt much of anything he could say would sway anyone.
Well, if you have a story like that about you published in the NE, the optics are terrible.
I am glad he’s not running around making baseless legal threats.
I don't think he's doing that out of principle. ;)
I’m a conservative who has stood for tort reform my whole adult life. I despise the modern quick-to-sue mentality. That’s the crap I expect from Democratic candidates like John Edwards.
I admire that.
However, if Cruz has had affairs, I suspect actual evidence, as opposed to innuendo, will be produced and he will suffer the just consequences of his own actions. The demise of his career will be on the man in the mirror and no one else.
Makes sense. And as a lawyer, surely you noticed his "non-denial" denials. A lot of lawyers have ripped his statements apart and said that such "denials" would never fly in court.
Oh, please... basement bloggers?
THAT is your “evidence?”
Heidi is on a "full-time leave of absence" from her job at Goldman Sachs, and has said she is working full time on Ted's campaign, "80 hours a week" she has said. But she'll be AWOL the week before Wisconsin?
Its not on drudge or rush for obvious reasons
It is on evening news
Even a bit on Fox
He could say: “I have never committed adultery. I have never been unfaithful to my wife.”
He won’t say it.
Beats me. I’d never heard that one before.
I think he would be best to LAUGH it off if he’s truly innocent. To say, “You think that *I, a devout Christian in a wonderful marriage with two beautiful daughters, would even THINK about ruining that, betraying my beliefs, by having adulterous sex? You think those hot young women who could attract any hunky young man would have sex with ME, middle aged, nerdy, not exactly a babe magnet? That’s a joke right? HAHA”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.