Haven’t you listened to Rush enough to know that polls like that are there to CREATE an opinion not reflect one?
This is childishly simple.
Trump’s “negatives” mean noting compared to the pitiful crowds she draws and the huge crowds he does. Those are the real FACTS. Another is that the Democrat turnout is dismal and dropping fast, only Bernie has any enthusiastic crowds. Another FACT is that Trump has brought MILLIONS back into the electoral game. One more FACT is that Republican turnouts have been much higher than 2012. But you can bet your butt on the FACT that the polls do not use turnout models from now but from 2012. Another FACT is that working class Democrats (Reagan Democrats) are voting for Trump.
It is also a FACT that I can cherry pick a population sample and get ANY result I want, that is exactly what is happening with these propaganda attempts.
If he were so beatable the Democratmedia would not be in a state of panic to defeat him. That is another FACT.
I never said you had to believe that his negatives are higher than Hillary’s. I’m just telling you they are
And I know the drill. Polls that show Trump doing well are gospel.Any that show him doing poorly are propaganda,
Polls are not perfect of course . But they are more scientific than the number of people who are at a certain rally.
And yes, I know what Rush has said about polls. He said that in 2012. He didn’t believe the polls and pointed to the TEA Party victory in 2010 and the Chik Fil A backlash as why he felt the polls were wrong. But the polls were right.
And as far as rally size, here’s an article from that period
http://bobmannblog.com/2012/10/29/beware-the-crowdsmanship-when-it-comes-to-campaign-rallies-does-size-matter/