“Sharia is not religious, it is political.”
They’ll claim that it’s part and parcel of their religion (and it is). Additionally (and unfortunately} the Constitution doesn’t define what is a religion. Even pastafarians have been given constitutional protection - that’s how idiotic it’s become.
I know we’re in love with the Constitution (and I am too), but, if there’s a problem with it we better address it. The founders were humans, and had enough foresight to put in provisions for changing it if enough people saw the need.
I’m getting to the point of believing that the freedom of religion clause needs to be changed. I wonder how many others are starting to think the same way. As it is right now it’s serving the Islamists rather well.
I think it would be pretty easy for American courts to refuse to sanction Sharia. You can’t allow some without accepting all, & under no circumstances would we allow the stoning to death of adulterers & or the chopping off of hands of thieves. The totality of Sharia is anathema to our constitution. Reject it as a package deal.