“Did you happen to see John Greschak’s analysis? He went into that.”
Yes, I did. He did some very good work presenting screenshots of the original sources. His proposed amendment at the end wouldn’t fly. It is really difficult to draft an amendment that is effective in denying the ability to twist or circumvent its intent and letter. It is very worthwhile to examine the parts in which he presents the information about natural born subjects. One of my pet peeves are the people who ignorantly attempt to equate natural born subjects with natural born citizens. That’s sheer dumb and stupid craziness.
And nearly universal in how our legal community views the subject.
Did you happen to see my theory of how the citizenship issue got so conflated with English Common law?