“It very clearly shows that the child born abroad of two U.S. citizen parents is to be considered as a natural born citizen.”
Yes, it does. The phrase “considered as” is the qualifier that clearly states the child is an alien born and not a natural born child who must employ the naturalization law to naturalize and thereby be “considered as” being entitled to exercise some but not all of the privileges and duties of an actual natural born citizen of the U.S. The twisted definition this judge and other people have attempted to misread into the Naturalization Act of 1790 is quite obviously disproven by citations of prior English naturalization laws and by the obvious rules of construction in this Naturalization Act of 1790. To see how that fails to make any legal sense you only need to use the same sentence construction on the same Naturalization Act of 1790 sentence stating the naturalization of a child born abroad with alien or foreign parents.
Pretty much sums it up. Can I direct all the hate I am getting to you?