[DiogenesLamp]

Are you serious? That was just a paragraph concerning our discussion from about a two page document.

So? It's still wrong.

You can find the same paragraph from any other source that shows the Act.

So? Other people's commentary doesn't affect the truth at all.

The "naturalization act of 1790" naturalized the children born outside the country to US Citizen fathers.

[odawg]

“So? Other people’s commentary doesn’t affect the truth at all.”

That a citation from part of the Act. It was not commmentary.

“The “naturalization act of 1790” naturalized the children born outside the country to US Citizen fathers.”

Have it your way. I am not interested with that. I mentioned the Act because it, in building its logic, just happened to define what a natural born citizen is. People want to claim that it was never defined.