How the hell would I know the answers to your irrelevant and trivial questions?
As to your formulaic approach to the determination of nbc status, I would only point out that what you seem to believe are requirements are no such thing. They are mere indicia.
The fact that they appear to have evolved or changed over time is evidence of that.
“As to your formulaic approach to the determination of nbc status, I would only point out that what you seem to believe are requirements are no such thing. They are mere indicia.”
“what you seem to believe are requirements are no such thing.”
“seem to believe”??? “no such requirement”???
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
Where is your wiggle room?
“The fact that they appear to have evolved or changed over time is evidence of that.”
The Constitution prescribes how it is to be amended. The NBC clause has never been amended.
Why are my questions irrelevant and trivial? Because to answer them would require you to abandon the delusional narrative that Cruz is a NBC?