Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Yashcheritsiy

“No, it was defined in English common law prior to the adoption of the Constitution. The reading in the law of 1790 was actually an aberrant definition, and one which Madison succeeded in removing a mere five years later.”

You are so full of crap.


128 posted on 03/20/2016 2:04:07 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: odawg

Well, I did eat a big dinner yesterday. But that has nothing to do with the article, or the fact that it demonstrates Cruz’s ineligibility.


255 posted on 03/21/2016 12:50:49 PM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (You can't have a constitution without a country to go with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson