Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Leaning Right

“If that argument is accepted, think how easy it would be for other things to be classified as “inflammatory”.”

Yes, pro-abortion people think that showing photos of aborted fetuses is inflammatory, etc. If we don’t protect inflammatory speech and denounce those that use violence to suppress it, then we aren’t actually protecting speech at all. Nobody cares about “non-inflammatory” speech.


93 posted on 03/15/2016 9:02:30 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
pro-abortion people think that showing photos of aborted fetuses is inflammatory, etc.

That's an excellent example right there. Those pictures are meant to provoke, and rightly so. I guess that's "inflammatory". The libs would love to ban them.

109 posted on 03/15/2016 9:29:03 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson