[Sasparilla]

..I wasn’t ‘interpreting’, I was simply reading and referring to the words written in English which seem to be easy to understand...

Unfortunately, when lawyers and courts get involved, there are different interpretations of plain words. That’s why there are myriad exceptions to search and seizure of the 4th Amendment. In a perfect world, no.

There is alot of controversy that you apparently arent aware of in this law.. There’s an analysis of a legal standby, void for vagueness, in the Cornell Law Review. No cases on this yet, but they are coming. I am in general agreement on the plain wording, but this is far from over.

[UCANSEE2]

BTW, here is how Obama, the DNC, and the SS handle protesters.

DNC Protesters Assigned to Fenced-Off Parking Lot for Obama's Speech

[UCANSEE2]

There is alot of controversy that you apparently arent aware of in this law..

I am very aware of it. The implication of the controversy is that the 'rule' should mean different things depending on WHO exactly is being protected, and WHOSE 'right' is being interfered with.

[UCANSEE2]

Unfortunately, when lawyers and courts get involved, there are different interpretations of plain words.

I cannot argue with that.