Good gwad.
Next up, breeding babies explicitly for the purpose because there aren't enough birth defects?
Why use organs from babies who were deemed so damaged that it was recommended they be killed?
Sounds like it’s just the abortion mill’s new way of justifying selling baby parts. The mother will check off a new box on the waiver form stating that she wants her child’s organs to be ‘donated’. It makes the mom feel like a hero and makes the selling of baby parts nice and legal.
And while they will use the term “donated”, there will be processing fees, handling fees, shipping fees and anything else they can think of to charge for...
There will probably be new procedures added-for health insurance- which will be performed by a special harvesting team- all legal.
And that means more money for this ‘noble’ cause without having to sell baby parts while having lunch with potential customers.
God help us...
I think this is fake.....it is a suggestion from the transplantation society or some such organization. But the line ‘after the child is declared stillborn’ is appalling. The transplantation society would like the woman to carry a ‘defective’ child as long as possible to enhance the viability of their organs......and then the child will be left do die and declared STILLBORN?? The translantation society needs to disband and spend the rest of their lives doing good works.
It’s not a bug: it’s a feature.