I was just answering your question. I wasn't intentionally being rude. I was only trying to help you get up to speed because I could see (by the post you replied to) that you were still up in the start of the thread, and the info you needed came after that.
i was simply responding to what was written in the article, and it gave NO background as to why the hotel was liable
I know. That's why I provided the link. I thought it would answer your questions.
journalism 101, who what when where and WHY, guess the author skipped the day they taught that 8^)
Yep.
yeah,and i appreciate that, my post #170 agrees with you that they ARE on the hook for it, i was catching sh!t upthread, didn't mean from you these idiots write articles like EVERYBODY must know what they think they are talking about and hang on their every word
damn