[ealgeone]

I'll tell you why.

I find it sad that conservatives are not defending the honor of this woman who did nothing other than check into a hotel room and had her privacy violated which is now all over the internet for pervs to see.

That you don't find that a problem is telling.

We were quick to jump on ol' slick willy and were right to do so for his "women" issues.

Perhaps though, ya'll were in favor of what slick did to women.

I'll say this again. If it happened to any of the female members in your family you'd be ready to fight.

If not, then you need to head over to the daily beast because you are not conservatives.

[Blue Jays]

Nice follow-up ad hominem attack to your earlier baseless ad hominem attacks, ealgeone.

[SoFloFreeper]

Hang on. I am not defending what happened to her. The expected privacy in a hotel room ought to be protected.

BUT the proportion here in the this civil case is absurd in my opinion. The perp was convicted. Did the business face criminal charges?

To me, this is overkill.