Clinton Likely be Indicted by May for Breach of National Security – Facing 1 to 10 Years

Pivot America ^ | March 6, 2016 | Patrick Curl

[2ndDivisionVet]

This video surfaced today combining video feeds from experts as to what's really going on with Clinton and her Email scandal. According to the video she could be facing charges from a Misdemeanor with up to 1 year sentence all the way up to a 10 year sentence and a felony.

It could even go up to the President of the United States, the question is how could the President not know that emails he was sending to his Secretary of State were not over a secure line to a secure email server, secured by the top security professionals, but instead a private email server setup by a Clinton staffer?

Some people ignoring polls say that Sanders can't beat Trump. Let me ask you this - please list one former President of the United States that won while serving jail time.

If the matter of Hillary Clinton's electability and a Democrat beating Donald Trump for the Whitehouse, then you must start to ask yourself - what will Trump say about her scandal, and has anyone EVER won a Presidential race while involved in a scandal this big?

(VIDEO-AT-LINK)

[meatloaf]

Don’t forget the FBI investigation is two pronged. They’re also looking into the pay-to-play scheme she ran while secretary of state to funnel money into the Clinton foundations.

[tflabo]

If Hillary would just go away its almost as good as if she just goes to jail. Either works for me. I say let her go away and disqualified for receiving any government pension. Such a deal.

[RC one]

Well, she can’t pardon herself... if she wins.

[utahagen]

I agree. Why are so many frepers so pessimistic? Yes, HRC probably won't go to prison, but her presidential ambitions may be derailed...and that's something.

[Mouton]

A sitting president cannot be indicted. He must be impeached and convicted by senate.

[Jet Jaguar]

BTTT

[GLDNGUN]

I have telling my wife and friends for weeks that this would be coming down.

Obama/Jarrett does not want Hillary to be President. They want a hand-picked puppet they can control. Hillary was picked to be SOS to keep her on a leash as long as possible, and for foreign policy failures to fall in her lap.

There is one thing Obama/Jarrett need from Hillary though, and that is her loyal supporters. It can't appear that Obama/Jarrett were behind Hillary's demise, or it would likely rip the democratic party in 2. Many Hillary supporters would not vote in November, or possibly even vote for a Donald Trump; therefore, Obama/Jarrett need the appearance of "clean hands". It must appear that not only did they not encourage an indictment of Hillary but actively opposed it and supported her.

Reading between the lines, you can see the set-up coming:

In October, Obama said in a 60 Minutes interview that Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of state didn't pose a national security threat. This was a very public statement to show his "support". Some in law enforcement were upset that Obama had interjected himself into the investigation but Mission accomplished. If he really wanted her to be exonerated why would he risk an apparent conflict of interest by making such a statement?

Obama has met several times privately with Clinton since she started running, which rankled Bernie Sanders because of Obama's perceived support for Hillary in the race when Presidents don't support primary candidates. Mission accomplished.

It upset Sanders to the point that he demanded and got a meeting himself with Obama in late January. He went in wanting an assurance that Obama would "play fair" and not show favoritism or support for Hillary. Sanders left the meeting saying he was sure that Obama would be "even-handed". He was certainly told more than that. He must have been told that Obama would be supporting her publicly but that it would be for public appearances only because Hillary was in deep trouble, legally, and that neither Obama or Sanders should be anywhere near the e-mail scandal when it blows up.

This explains why there was not even a whimper from Sanders when Obama DID publicly endorse Hillary through his press secretary, Josh Ernest, a few days later; otherwise it makes no sense whatsoever. If Bernie was mad about a "perceived" support of Hillary from Obama would he not be outraged at a public support of her? Especially when Obama supposedly told him just a few days before that he would be "even-handed".

Make no mistake, it was a very public endorsement of Hillary from Obama through his Press Secretary. There is absolutely NO way Ernest makes that comment without instructions to do so, even though he tried to downplay as not an official endorsement or something Obama had said. When has a President's Press Secretary EVER revealed his boss's private thoughts or opinions on something that was not for public consumption? Did he have to walk back those comments? No. Did Obama contradict anything his press secretary said? No. Did Sanders say a peep about any of this? No. Mission accomplished.

Now Obama is clearly on the record showing support for Hillary. Hillary is effusive in her praise of Obama, thinking by doing this, she is garnering Obama's continued support. But the rug is about to be pulled from under her.

Sanders thinks he just needs to play along, stay alive in the race and avoid attacking her on the e-mail issue so when she falls the nomination will fall to him. Of course that is exactly what Obama/Jarrett want him to think as they need him to play his part, which is create some opposition to her so the democratic party hasn't already been 100% unified behind her by the time she is indicted.

VP Joe Biden will appear at that time to "save the day" for the democrats, giving them a "mainstream" alternative to Sanders. With Obama's support, Biden will become the nominee. Obama/Jarrett/Biden can say "Hey, we are as shocked and devastated as are all Hillary supporters...but we must come together for the sake of the party and country...we can't let the republicans win!"

Of course, Biden is an absolute clueless idiot, but a useful idiot for the Obama/Jarrett purposes. To get Obama's support he will have to take the Obama/Jarrett hand-picked VP nominee to be on the ticket. Mission Accomplished.

Should Joe Biden somehow be elected...he should sleep with not one eye but with both eyes wide open.

[Tonytitan]

"I want the American people to focus on the first election of a female to our beloved presidency— So I HEREBY GRANT PRE-iNDICTMENT CLEMENCY TO HILLIARY RODHAM CLINTON”

He can't do anything like that without opening himself up to an Obstruction of Justice charge. He would be seen as trying to protect a crony.

[2ndDivisionVet]

My wife gets a lot of comments when she wears that t-shirt.

[topfile]

Okay....so there’s this bridge over the Hudson...see..

[Syncro]

It’s going to be difficult, she is watched over and protected by angels.

[Theodore R.]

The word “likely” is likely wrong in this headline.

[utahagen]

Me, too.

[Jane Austen]

Nobody is asking Hillary tough questions. So far Sanders also has gone soft on her.

I hope somebody at the ongoing debate puts her on the spot. I had to turn the debate off because I could not take her screaming and shouting. Her manner of speaking is beyond irritating.

[Tonytitan]

...dancing the Tyburn Jig

What does that look like? Especially with her doing it.

[TornadoAlley3]

[applpie]

If oBama let’s her off in someway and she becomes criminal in chief — could he get some sort of extended power through her in repayment?

[Cowgirl of Justice]

Who is looking for the missing $6 billion?

[Fractal Trader]

Not a highly credible new source to lead with in Breaking News.

[utahagen]

An indictment of HRC would be a pretty good start.