Moderators don't get a pass just because they happen to shoot at the same target as you. This is where your side fails. You never look beyond the immediate supposed advantage you might have to consider what the long term consequences might be. Tough QUESTIONS on ISSUES would be nice change from these three minute campaign attack ads pretending to be questions we get from these fake “moderators”
Candidate you like in the future will get the same treatment if these sort of gutter scum tactics are not ruthlessly stomped on now.
This is the problem too many “Conservative” have, they are too busy looking to only the next election to consider the longer term consequences of actions that seem to benefit them now.
Cruious also, NOW the tactic is ok? Was not considered acceptable when it was Cruz as the target
Megyn Kelly ADMITS to Ted Cruz the record shows he DID NOT SUPPORT legalization in 2013 Amnesty showdown
Ted Cruz was on with Megyn Kelly right after the debate tonight and midway through the interview she brought up her question to him about his poison pill amendments in the 2013 showdown on amnesty in the Senate.
What I thought was noteworthy was that Kelly admitted to Cruz that after thoroughly reviewing his record on whether or not he supported legalization, she believes his record does support his argument that his amendments were really poison pill amendments and that he never actually supported legalization.
You mean like asking Trump how he saves $1 trillion dollars by eliminating a department that costs $80 billion?
Or asking how he saves $300 million in medicare prescription costs when the entire expenditure is $300 million?
Those kinds of issue questions?
Trump turns any chance to reveal actual details into ramblings about polls and how great he's going to make things.