To: Smokin' Joe
I don’t like the caucus idea. I much prefer a straight vote by the voters. Less chance of hanky-panky.
To: Parley Baer
I agree, I'd prefer a closed primary. But to not even have a caucus effectively strips us of our ability to be heard.
We have been disenfranchised.
3 posted on
03/02/2016 9:30:58 AM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Parley Baer
However, in the past North Dakota held its primary in September.
To: Parley Baer
It's not about caucus vs. primary. It's about binding and not binding delegates.
Iowa Republicans seem to have figured out how to run a caucus that binds delegates.
Why can't North Dakota and Colorado figure it out?
To: Parley Baer
I dont like the caucus idea. I much prefer a straight vote by the voters. Less chance of hanky-panky.
That's fine in closed primary states, but in states like Georgia where there is no party registration, there is no way to keep non-Republicans from performing the hanky-panky.
24 posted on
03/02/2016 10:46:17 AM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson