Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokin' Joe

I don’t like the caucus idea. I much prefer a straight vote by the voters. Less chance of hanky-panky.


2 posted on 03/02/2016 9:28:40 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Parley Baer
I agree, I'd prefer a closed primary. But to not even have a caucus effectively strips us of our ability to be heard.

We have been disenfranchised.

3 posted on 03/02/2016 9:30:58 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Parley Baer

However, in the past North Dakota held its primary in September.


5 posted on 03/02/2016 9:32:15 AM PST by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Parley Baer
It's not about caucus vs. primary. It's about binding and not binding delegates.

Iowa Republicans seem to have figured out how to run a caucus that binds delegates.

Why can't North Dakota and Colorado figure it out?

15 posted on 03/02/2016 9:42:50 AM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Parley Baer
I don’t like the caucus idea. I much prefer a straight vote by the voters. Less chance of hanky-panky.

That's fine in closed primary states, but in states like Georgia where there is no party registration, there is no way to keep non-Republicans from performing the hanky-panky.
24 posted on 03/02/2016 10:46:17 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson