Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tinyowl

Nice try at deflection.. and I know this revelation is difficult for you.

I never made the claim Trump supports the fisting of children or any other wild-eyed strawman you included in your comment.

The point is... Trump donated to an organization that has some nefarious intentions. Can YOU agree with THAT?


86 posted on 02/29/2016 7:50:38 PM PST by ScottinVA (If you're not enraged...why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: ScottinVA

Where’s the proof?


91 posted on 02/29/2016 7:52:47 PM PST by bigtoona (Lose on amnesty, socialism cemented in place forever Trump is the only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: ScottinVA
I already agreed with that.

And it's meaningless. Some of Bill Gates money has gone to that stuff without him knowing. Some of Romney's has. If Cruz were rich, some of his would have.

You know it's meaningless, so you used the 'fist' thing to smear Trump. Otherwise you would have just said 'nefarious gay organization' or whatever you backed up to.

Maybe you're just obsessed with fisting children, because I see you researched it and posted it obsessively. I think it excites you.

Now that is of course crap (maybe it is, and maybe it isn't,) but that's the kind of thing that's being leveled at Trump, and that's the spirit in which you leveled it at him.

It is 100% meaningless that this money went to a lewd organization, if it even did, because you know damn well he doesn't support it. You could make a case that he's bad at managing his money except that it's .0000002% or whatever of his net worth.

So just stop it, and don't pretend like your upset I'm playing 'gotcha' after you are out there playing 'gotcha' - you're just like the name-callers - you accuse Trump of calling people names and then you call him and all his supporters clowns. In this case, you get all pissy with me for playing word games with you when that exactly what you are doing.

111 posted on 02/29/2016 8:02:29 PM PST by tinyowl (A equals A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: ScottinVA

No, the point is, the day before Super Tuesday, an article that posts a screenshot of a part of a document makes this claim.

IF, and that’s a big if, it turns out to be true, then the Trump foundation screwed up, and out of the many charities that they give to they failed to vet at least one that got a small contribution.

Am I ok with that? It’s an error the candidate’s charitable foundation made, so no. The foundation shouldn’t do that. Do I understand it beyond the infantile level of jumping up and down and screaming “he did it!” over and over? Yes.


113 posted on 02/29/2016 8:04:41 PM PST by M1911A1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson