So I guess that's why they are all voting for Trump.
To: Citizen Zed
“When did you stop beating your wife?”
To: Citizen Zed
Barack Obama loved the poor.
Love them so much, he made some more.
3 posted on
02/29/2016 11:43:47 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Citizen Zed
Liberals measure compassion by how many people are on some form of government relief.
Conservatives measure compassion by how many people no longer need it.
4 posted on
02/29/2016 11:45:03 AM PST by
dfwgator
To: Citizen Zed
As RNC chairman Reince Priebus argued in 2013, the party’s long-term success depends on shedding its image as the “party of the rich,” of the “narrow-minded” and the “out of touch." One way to do that would be for idiots like Priebus to stop conceding that Republican policies are out of touch, narrow minded and for the rich or that the GOP somehow has to change or soft-pedal conservative policies to be for the poor. "Compassionate conservatism" was a disaster when Bush and Rove were pushing it.
5 posted on
02/29/2016 12:08:20 PM PST by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: Citizen Zed
“Helping the poor” has become the Uniparty’s code words for enacting socialism. Appeals to the moral vanity of hypocrites, like the Big Government apparatchiks who put as many alms as possible into their own pockets as finder’s fees.
6 posted on
02/29/2016 12:12:13 PM PST by
Albion Wilde
(Who can actually defeat the Democrats in 2016? -- the most important thing about all candidates.)
To: Citizen Zed
They had a meeting. What did that accomplish exactly?
9 posted on
03/01/2016 5:12:55 AM PST by
subterfuge
(TED CRUZ FOR POTUS!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson