Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

YES you do have it correct!! They want Apple to build a back door program to get into the phone. Apple’s problem is that Apple could be hacked themselves while creating this backdoor putting all of their phones at risk!! I would have to side with Apple on this!!! This particular phone was his government work phone it has special encryption that Apple cannot just hack into !!


25 posted on 02/17/2016 9:29:14 PM PST by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Kit cat

If the government is so concerned with stopping terrorism....HOW ABOUT NOT LETTING THE TERRORISTS IN THE COUNTRY IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!

Don’t make a private company do your dirty work for you.


27 posted on 02/17/2016 9:31:02 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Kit cat
YES you do have it correct!!

Nope.

35 posted on 02/17/2016 9:40:36 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: All

Lots of shaky “facts” in this article...first off all 70 times were prior to iOS ver. 8...Apple improved customer’s security with ver. 8 & 9. All data is now encrypted with 256 bit AES and Apple has lost the ability to read the data. The FBI is now looking for a crack for the “anti-brute force” protections (10 password tries then phone erases itself & the “timer functions” that require more & more time between password tries) so they can attempt to “brute-force “ the terrorist’s password. Secondly, in the “New York Case” that the article is based on, the government used the “All Writs Act” (not a search warrant as the article states), and the judge in that case clearly indicated that the All Writs Act probably doesn’t compel Apple to attempt to crack it’s own security:

“In October 2015, Magistrate Judge James Orenstein of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, expressed strong doubts that he had legal authority to order Apple to unlock an iPhone in government possession.”

He said:

“[Apple] is a private-sector company that is free to choose to promote its customers’ interests in privacy over the competing interest of law enforcement,” wrote Orenstein in his memorandum and court order.”

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/02/17/the-esoteric-law-being-used-to-fight-apple.html

So the current judge is on shaky ground when using the “All Writs Act”.

New York Case:
https://ia801501.us.archive.org/27/items/gov.uscourts.nyed.376325/gov.uscourts.nyed.376325.2.0.pdf

San Bernardino case judge order:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2714001-SB-Shooter-Order-Compelling-Apple-Asst-iPhone.html


40 posted on 02/17/2016 9:48:32 PM PST by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson