Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pollster1

I agree. It’s silly to act like a Carrier is some vulnerable dinosaur. They are not out there alone either. In the kind of war where a nation would think it was cool to try to sink a carrier, the screening force or USN subs will be aggressively killing anything that gets close.

Use a nuke on a fleet and that will be the last act of that nation.

A USN carrier task force really isn’t really such an easy thing to target, or it would have already been done.


37 posted on 02/13/2016 10:12:21 AM PST by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

If you look at Soviet (okay, Russian these days) exercises simulating a strike on a carrier, it is clear that this is no easy mission. They are willing to put a tremendous amount of resources into a strike, and it’s clearly a one-way mission either for most of the strike force or for all of it. It’s also clear that they think it’s worth trying because of the danger posed by a carrier, or they wouldn’t keep trying to figure it out.

Having been on carriers (after I left the Navy) and on subs (never as a carrier escort but I have played against a carrier), I know that taking down a carrier would be extremely difficult. A single attack could easily cost Russia almost as much as the carrier cost us, and their probability of success (defined as a mission kill against the carrier itself, not just a few aircraft splashed or a couple of DDGs taken out) would still not be good.


46 posted on 02/13/2016 10:34:04 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson