Replies

As well, Cruz has a great big problem with a lot of us who believe that we need to beef up the constitutional requirements for the office of presidency, which clearly states that the president must be born on American soil of two citizen parents. After Obama, who at least claims to be native born, it should crystal clear to everyone that this clause written into the very constitution itself by our forefathers is very good. Not only do we need to pass legislation mandating this, but also that the candidates must provide ironclad indisputable proof both parents were citizen, and the candidate was born here. In addition, the candidate should provide academic records, health records, and pass a top-level security clearance. Had we a proviso that the candidate must pass a security clearance, we never would have had Mr. Clinton and we would not now have Mrs. Clinton. So, personally, since I think this is very important, I am not going to vote for Cruz (or Rubio) even in the unlikely event either is the nominee, because I want there to be no impediment for a future congress to do something about this, which I think, would be a front and center issue for the GOP if not for Cruz/Rubio/Jindahl. We had better do something about this issue and do it soon, or someday we will have the spectacle of an anchor baby perhaps, from China, Mexico, Somalia, etc., who has no real connection to this country, who may speak little or no English, running for president and being “elected” by all the other grown-up anchor babies and illegals. This is far more likely to happen, if we do away with the electoral college, so that 10-20 biggest cities with lots of illegals and lots of fraud effectively take our country away from us. In my opinion, electing Cruz would be the absolutely worst thing we could do to ourselves. On the other hand, Cruz would make a great supreme court justice, and there is no reason why he could not be.