Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RC one

What I find interesting is that there has never, in 226 years, been an openly foreign born President. Arthur is likely the exception but he had the sense to hide his illegitimacy. This is 226 years of historical precedent that Ted Cruz is attempting to undo.
_______________________________

Agree.

There was never conclusive proof of Arthur being born in Canada, as far as I know.


167 posted on 02/06/2016 9:53:01 AM PST by GeaugaRepublican (Ted Cruz is not an 'outsider", He's worked 224 of 247 months of total career in govt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: GeaugaRepublican

To see conservatives use the left’s “birther” arguments against their own because they happen to support a candidate with doubts in this regard has been unsettling, to me at least.


171 posted on 02/06/2016 9:58:06 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: GeaugaRepublican

Even if he was born in Canada, he hid that fact from history. He sneaked through the back door undetected. Cruz isn’t hiding anything. He’s just walking through the front door and leaving it wide open for the next ineligible President. That’s much different and much worse IMHO.


172 posted on 02/06/2016 10:00:16 AM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson