Posted on 02/02/2016 12:36:43 PM PST by Citizen Zed
For nearly three decades, politicians, pollsters, and pundits have considered support for ethanol a litmus test for legitimacy in Iowa presidential politics. Former Vice President Al Gore, who won the Iowa Democratic caucuses in 2000, famously explained the strategizing over ethanol policies that has occurred in many campaign war rooms over the years:
[First-generation ethanol I think was a mistake. . . . One of the reasons I made that mistake is that I paid particular attention to the farmers in my home state of Tennessee, and I had a certain fondness for the farmers in the state of Iowa because I was about to run for president. ]
The question commentators and analysts are trying to answer now, is this: After the Iowa caucus victory by Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, who openly opposed the renewable fuel standard (RFS) -- i.e., the federal law that mandates certain levels of ethanol be belnded into the nation's fuel supply -- is the era of ethanol policy dominating the Iowa primary process over?
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
You don’t even know who I support....
Or DON’T Support.
That’s the trouble with the Trump haters: They pathologically assume that anyone who points out a negative truth about their favorite savior are Trump Lovers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.