Hybrid “dogs,” hybrid “parents.” I’m guessing there are more deserving targets of your fury. This article isn’t a war on parents, children or humans. Try not to lose sight of its salient content.
The article clearly associates the owners as “parents”.
From the article:
“Wolfdog parents end up overwhelmed and underprepared for the challenges that come along with caring for such active and cunning animals, which leads wolf-hybrids to be surrendered to sanctuaries, or worse … abandoned in the streets.”
Animal parents cannot surrender their offspring to sanctuaries.
There is no fury, simply pointing out that words have meaning, and changing the meaning of words is an underhanded but effective trick of propagandists to change our thinking.
Animals are not humans; but there is a significant group on the left that want to minimize and ignore the differences. They want us to think of people as animals and animals as people; this adds to moral confusion and to diffusion/loss of people taking responsibility for their actions.