[Lakeshark]

Here's a couple of examples. It's the normal kind of question for someone from each party. Now you tell me what's obviously different in these two questions and why they would both be unfair.

1. Mr. Cruz, wasn't your wife over the top in securing you campaign loans, and then purposefully hiding them the way you did?

2. Secretary Clinton, weren't you thrilled when the maker of that scurrilous video was finally brought to justice?

[don-o]

Now you tell me what's obviously different in these two questions and why they would both be unfair.

I cannot do that until you and I have an agreed upon set of facts.

[don-o]

OK. I will try, laying aside the innuendo you put on me. I don't think your examples are very well formed. Or is that your point?

1. Mr. Cruz, wasn't your wife over the top in securing you campaign loans, and then purposefully hiding them the way you did?

1. "Over the top" is a vague, undefined term.
2. Presumes facts not in evidence.

2. Secretary Clinton, weren't you thrilled when the maker of that scurrilous video was finally brought to justice?

The language is clunky, but I see no unfairness.

Sec Clinton, the maker of a video that you described as "scurrilous" has been brought to justice. Are you pleased at this outcome?