52 thoughts on “How accurate are findings from the frontiers of climate science? For example, about warming of the oceans.â€
*****************************************
Editor of the Fabius Maximus website says:
A new study about global warming, mentioned at WUWT this morning: “Industrial-era global ocean heat uptake doubles in recent decades†by Peter Glecker et al, Nature Climate Change, Jan 2016. Again little attention to uncertainty of the data. It’s a fascinating study, with several aspect worth discussion.
Also see “Study: Man-Made Heat Put in Oceans Has Doubled Since 1997†by AP’s Seth Borenstein.
John Robertson says:
Nice job, having skimmed the article I come away with a wine induced snicker.
To think we knew the temperature of the ocean or its heat content accurate to 0.1 C in 1955.
Twain comes to mind, something about what amazing results one can imagine from so little information.
However you have touched upon the idiocy of Climatology.
Such certainty of accuracy, precision without foundation.
Worshipping the noise of the ethers.
The over view of earth systems and what changes may have occurred are about what we can infer from polar ice extent.
A guess.
But whatever the Team IPCC ™ guess might be this week, one can be sure it is “accurate †to two decimal places and unprecedented in the chosen record.