[Cboldt]

As I suggested before, you are free to dismiss my contention on the basis of me failing to produce a point cite. The section of naturalization at birth law has changed little between 1934 and now. I don’t care if you believe me or not. If you require seeing the particular language in order to believe, look it up. I have to look things up for myself, often. It’s no big deal. If you doubt what I say, and it’s important to you, look it up. It’s not important to me that you accept my contention. I’m happy as a clam if you tell me I made it up out of whole cloth, or haven’t met my burden of proof.

[2pets]

"As I suggested before, you are free to dismiss my contention on the basis of me failing to produce a point cite. The section of naturalization at birth law has changed little between 1934 and now. I don't care if you believe me or not. If you require seeing the particular language in order to believe, look it up."

------------------------------------------

I did. Under the 1952 law in effect at the time of Cruz's birth in Canada he was not even born a US citizen, let alone a natural born citizen.

Sec 320:

Child Born Outside of United States of One Alien and One Citizen Parent at Time of Birth; Conditions under which Citizenship Automatically Acquired

[2pets]

"As I suggested before, you are free to dismiss my contention on the basis of me failing to produce a point cite. The section of naturalization at birth law has changed little between 1934 and now. I don’t care if you believe me or not. If you require seeing the particular language in order to believe, look it up. I have to look things up for myself, often. It’s no big deal. If you doubt what I say, and it’s important to you, look it up. It’s not important to me that you accept my contention. I’m happy as a clam if you tell me I made it up out of whole cloth, or haven’t met my burden of proof."

-----------------------------------------------

Cite the relevant part of the 1952 Act that naturalizes Cruz.