Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Is the Conservative? David Brooks vs. Ted Cruz
The Imaginative Conservative ^ | Bruce Frohnen

Posted on 01/16/2016 3:53:12 PM PST by don-o

There is more, of course. Mr. Brooks is careful not to actually accuse evangelicals of bigotry for their opposition to same-sex marriage. But he does say they are on the losing side of history and will only be "further marginalized" by opposition to it. And this is the crux of his effete pique. Mr. Brooks, for all his increasingly silly claims to be conservative, is quite convinced that "history" is on the side of those like Mr. Obama who seek a new order, in which the state distributes goods and status to all people. Confident he will always get or keep "his," Mr. Brooks can only define Christianity as encouraging the state to see that the masses are kept quiescent with handouts.

That this vision is not conservative, and that it bears little relationship to America outside Mayor Bill de Blasio's realm should be obvious. That our chattering classes, should they continue to adhere to this vision, either will become irrelevant or eventually find themselves fighting over the last silk stockings at Barneys even as the mobs break down the doors, also should be clear. Unfortunately for Mr. Brooks, it appears that sufficient attention to one's cuff links precludes recognition of unpleasant realities until it is too late to do anything about them. Best, then, to leave Mr. Brooks to his well-upholstered kennel to defend the standards of a rotted-out ruling class.

(Excerpt) Read more at theimaginativeconservative.org ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Fine writing. More at source.
1 posted on 01/16/2016 3:53:12 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: don-o

David Brooks we all for Crystal Mangum and Mike Nifong, before he became against them.


2 posted on 01/16/2016 3:57:26 PM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Brooks is a conservative only in the sense he and other leftists falsely apply the label to him. In reality he is a progressive elitist, like the rest of the editorial staff at the NYT.


3 posted on 01/16/2016 3:59:57 PM PST by Soul of the South (Tomorrow is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

I didn’t know Brooks was running for office.


4 posted on 01/16/2016 4:02:28 PM PST by DaveyB (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

” That our chattering classes, should they continue to adhere to this vision, either will become irrelevant or eventually find themselves fighting over the last silk stockings at Barneys even as the mobs break down the doors, also should be clear.”

Clever. This fits Larry Kudlow as well.


5 posted on 01/16/2016 4:03:59 PM PST by Pelham (Nikki Haley, ethnically cleansing South Carolina for the GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveyB

“I didn’t know Brooks was running for office.”

Much as it may violate standard practice around here you always have the option of reading the article to find out what the author was getting at.


6 posted on 01/16/2016 4:06:51 PM PST by Pelham (Nikki Haley, ethnically cleansing South Carolina for the GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: don-o

" The natural born citizen clause in the Constitution has inadvertently proven to be an effective Litmus test for determining who is a true conservative willing to protect and defend the Constitution versus those person who pretend to be conservatives while actually abrogating and subverting the Constitution to the detriment of the Republic."

House Atreides


Ted is as much a conservative as he is a Natural born citizen.

7 posted on 01/16/2016 4:10:38 PM PST by Souled_Out (Our hope is in the power of God working through the hearts of people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveyB

I don’t need to read anything by fake David Brooks. I know what he is.


8 posted on 01/16/2016 4:53:22 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Sodom and Gomorrah were on the losing side of history.

Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God. (1 Corinthians 6:9,10)

The unrepentant sodomites (and others) are headed for hell. And hell is a place of eternal torment.

9 posted on 01/17/2016 3:52:00 AM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson