Thanks to PROCON for the ping. Sorry so late. (Working)
No Steven, I haven’t watched this video, I don’t care, but I’ll watch yours.
I keep seeing this over and over on Fox News. It is riling up the masses of morons who still don’t know the difference between television and reality.
This further shows that the “millennial generation” is the worst generation in the history of this nation.
That’s some pretty outrageous parody click bait...
I downloaded the entire season, watched about a third of the first episode, then deleted the lot. It was a snoozer.
I haven’t watched it, and don’t plan to. Ever.
Semi-Satire, huh? LOL!
Careful there are folks here who believe everything Netflix feeds them
LOL, thanks for the heads-up, but...no...I am in no danger of watching it!
But as another poster said...I’ll watch the ones you put out!
“Everyone has seen Making a Murderer on Netflix.”
No, I have not and probably most people haven’t seen that show. I have read about it.
Oops, Rush said this was a great show. Wonder what he says now?
Try convincing yourself Brendan Dassey wasn’t keel-hauled by Manitowoc County. Absolutely no evidence against him before Weigert and Fassbender induced a “confession.” All because he was a going to be a witness on Avery’s behalf.
After that though, if we assume they did not cut out parts that significantly change the nature of the story ...
The issue isn't whether he did it or not. The issue is whether he should have been found guilty, and whether there is good reason to believe the cops were totally corrupt and railroaded him.
Avery: Guilty under our law? Not guilty. Plenty of reasonable doubt. Actually guilty? maybe fully, maybe involved. If I had to bet a dollar, I'd say 'no.', probably his relatives, partly in cahoots with whatever cops had the most to lose by the civil suit going forward, probably with a lot of money involved. (In that area, not much money is a lot of money)
The cops? Can't convict them either in a court of law. Pretty sure they are guilty of a little or a lot though. Some of those individuals had a lot to lose. When your life, career and reputation, and perhaps jail time resulting from discoveries in the civil suit are at stake ... would some kill - justify it that 'types like Avery' even if they didn't do this murder were probably guilty enough of how they lived to deserve to pay for the mistakes of an upstanding cop who maybe long ago made a mistake in putting the wrong guy away? Yep.
Assuming Netflix didn't leave out something that significantly changes the facts, it's the most convincing argument against the death penalty you can make, unless there are multiple independent eye witnesses and DNA evidence to back up a 1st degree case.
You don't have to be a bleeding heart to know there are plenty of bad cops and that human beings lie and justify their actions all the time, especially when they are in danger of losing everything.
Guilty pleasures for him?
Never watched that show, never needed to watch it. Obvious to me the guy is murderous scum, and any “show” that purports otherwise is lying piece of propaganda.