Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob434

The annuity is based on the interest rate if the cash value is invested in ultra-safe bonds, usually 30 years US Treasuries. With interest rates this low I would think it a poor long term investment since the annuity does not adjust for possibly higher inflation and historically stocks are a much better investment over the long term.

The big argument in favor of the annuity is that it is essentially stupid insurance. It allows the winner to do some dumb things and make mistakes, maybe taking investment advice from uncle Roy, or letting your dead beat cousins mooch off you for a few years until you get tired of it, and still know that that you are not gonna be broke. A 2015 study by the Harvard business School showed that about 40% of lottery winners burn through their winnings in the first 5 years. Most people who play the lottery, and therefor most who win, come from backgrounds that leave them intellectually and temperamentally ill-equipped to deal with sudden wealth. For them, the annuity is almost always going to be the best choice, though it is rarely taken.


15 posted on 01/08/2016 9:10:43 AM PST by NRx (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: NRx

Off to buy a ticket now!


17 posted on 01/08/2016 9:13:14 AM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

I ne’er stand the stupid theory. But damn, that would be all star stupid. That would require a spending spree that would be difficult to keep up.


26 posted on 01/08/2016 9:54:22 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson