Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The mystery of the naked black hole
AAAS Science ^ | 5 January 2016 2:45 pm | Daniel Clery

Posted on 01/06/2016 6:59:33 PM PST by Utilizer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Utilizer

Thanks! bfl.


21 posted on 01/07/2016 12:04:10 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99

Should be alright if you have “safe search” on. Otherwise, get the kids out of the room real fast!


22 posted on 01/07/2016 12:12:40 AM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99
WARNING! Do NOT Google this title!

Looks pretty tame to me ... the mystery of the naked black hole.

But I bet you could liven up the SERP a bit simply by adding the word porn to the query ... dare you!

23 posted on 01/07/2016 12:16:47 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody; REDWOOD99
Looks pretty tame to me... But I bet you could liven up the SERP a bit simply by adding the word porn to the query

No need to add any additional words.
I didn't dare try it with "safe search" off.

__________________________________________________________________________________

 photo the mystery of the naked black hole 01 b_zpsu5rcry7w.jpg

24 posted on 01/07/2016 1:02:38 AM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Who uses Yahoo for search? LOL!

I would have to make a deliberate choice to do that (similar to making a deliberate choice to add the word "porn" to the Google query).

BTW, I never turn on safe search. If it's unsafe, I want to know. Adding "porn" to a query is simply giving the search engine a hint as to what I want. That's the way I like it — me in control!

25 posted on 01/07/2016 1:13:12 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
OK. I almost forgot Yahoo runs a search engine. It's been inferior since before Google appeared on the scene.

Just tried the query. With Safesearch on, the results are unsatisfactory: a worthless warning page. With Safesearch off, the results are also unsatisfactory: gratuitous porn results (preceded by a lawyer screen — I have nothing but contempt for those) intermixed with legitimate results.

I will stick with the GOOG and forget that Yahoo ever had or has a search engine.

26 posted on 01/07/2016 1:22:54 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

I’ve been using Yahoo Search for years. It’s worked pretty good for me. Can’t stand anything involving Google. They’re way too intrusive, linking your PC to all sorts of other crap of theirs.


27 posted on 01/07/2016 1:28:17 AM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Do the math

Since they can’t be observed, They are conjectures.


28 posted on 01/07/2016 2:07:58 AM PST by Theophilus (Be as prolific as you are pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin

So many punch lines, so little time...


29 posted on 01/07/2016 2:09:18 AM PST by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: max americana

this all jes plain RACESS!!!


30 posted on 01/07/2016 7:13:02 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><> GO CRUZ!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise





31 posted on 01/07/2016 7:26:58 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><> GO CRUZ!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Theophilus

We can find black holes by their Hawking radiation and their imense gravity. NASA just found another one yesterday only 100 billion light years away. Scientists have also proven the existence of black holes by their lensing effect as predicted by Einstein’s theory.


32 posted on 01/07/2016 10:25:08 AM PST by Do the math (Doug)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer

Could a black hole be a means of escape from our universe into the outside?


33 posted on 01/07/2016 10:32:17 AM PST by Hot Tabasco (Dear Santa: Please find a home for every homeless and unwanted cat and dog that is suffering)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StringTheory
Thanks Utilizer.

· String Theory Ping List ·
It is not rape-rape.
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


34 posted on 01/07/2016 1:23:17 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

I believe you need to settle on a definition of what exactly you mean by “outside” before you can attain an answer to that particular question.


35 posted on 01/07/2016 5:29:24 PM PST by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the muzrims trying to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Anytime, mate!


36 posted on 01/07/2016 5:30:21 PM PST by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the muzrims trying to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer
I believe you need to settle on a definition of what exactly you mean by “outside” before you can attain an answer to that particular question.

Well, if the experts say the universe is expanding, there has to be something out there beyond the edge that it is expanding in to.............But what do I know.....LOL!

37 posted on 01/07/2016 5:46:51 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Dear Santa: Please find a home for every homeless and unwanted cat and dog that is suffering)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Do the math
The "lensing effect" was predicted by Isaac Newton (Opticks Book 3 Part 1 Query 1). Its value can be calculated using the least-time theorem of Heron of Alexandria.
38 posted on 01/07/2016 9:32:01 PM PST by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: some tech guy

The behavior of light near a massive bosy was indeed predicted by Einstein. Arthur Eddington tested the prediction during the eclipse of 1919, and claimed Einstein was right.

It was later discovered that the had thrown away the 85% of the observations that refuted Einstein, and kept the 15% that could be fudged to confirm him. This has been called “the biggest hoax in 20th century science”.

Almost every other prediction by Einstein also proved false. The constancy of the speed of light was refuted by the experiment of Michaelson and Gale, by the Sagnac experiment, and by the Haefele-Keating experiment.

A bibliograhy of the several German experiemnts that verified faster-than-light transmission of information can be founs at http://www.aei.mpg.de/~mpoessel/Physik/FTL/tunnelingftl.html.


39 posted on 01/07/2016 9:41:33 PM PST by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson