Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Yaelle

Also hire an independent to do the blood analysis. There is no doubt in my mind that Lt.Lemm used that old evidence blood to put him in the car. The preservative chemical had to be in that sample. The FBI went through the motions and offered up what they needed to hear. Also the jury was in the dark about this and some other issues. Interesting stuff. Food for thought. It just shows what a person is up against when accused by the state of a crime.


104 posted on 01/03/2016 12:39:56 PM PST by MountainYankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: MountainYankee

Then the question remains....who is the killer? Avery says he saw her drive away.


105 posted on 01/03/2016 12:45:40 PM PST by MountainYankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: MountainYankee
There was another huge red flag....The evidence box had been tampered with and the blood vial punctured. Lab Corp stated they don't do that. The whole FBI blood test was obviously a last minute reprieve for the State. I'd be curious to know how many times that ‘new and improved” test has been used since the Avery trial.
112 posted on 01/04/2016 4:58:32 AM PST by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson