To: Paladin2
A normally aspirated V8 does not have the low-end torque of a turbo or supercharged engine. Acceleration out of slow corners suffers. There was probably intense analysis on engine rules vs. fuel milage, torque and weight.
10 posted on
01/02/2016 8:10:51 PM PST by
MtnClimber
(For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
To: MtnClimber
It’s RPM That makes You Fast ,
but it’s Torque that gets you there.
12 posted on
01/02/2016 8:22:20 PM PST by
Big Red Badger
(UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
To: MtnClimber
Race engines have typically had small cylinder size. One zttribute being a short stroke to help with higher rpm max to maximize air flow. IC engines are basicakly air pumps. Turboing a smaller cylinder vol V-8 is prefersble to a V-6 od equal displacement. Plus there is a driveline benefit of less torque variability amplitude. V-8s are kinda the sweet spot for that. V-12s are nice and I WANT ONE, but I would settle for a V-8.
Note thaT I own two 4banger turbo Diesels that are GREAT!
15 posted on
01/02/2016 8:29:12 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: MtnClimber
A normally aspirated V8 does not have the low-end torque of a turbo or supercharged engine. Acceleration out of slow corners suffers. There was probably intense analysis on engine rules vs. fuel milage, torque and weight.Yepper - my 2.0 liter turbo develops max torque at 1250 rpm and max ponies at 5000 or so - the complimentary curves keep it feeling strong throughout the whole band. 208 HP and quicker (from zero - governor-won't-let-it-go-faster) than my last which was a V-6 with 268 ponies. Get's 25% better mileage too....
45 posted on
01/03/2016 5:53:08 AM PST by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson