It would be a simple matter to write a program that searches the Internet for certain keywords and generates realistic rants — of any kind.
That explain the Freepers demanding more lesser evil liberals be elected every 4 years no matter what. They arent even human. Which doesn’t shock me.
Great article. Well worth the click.
The left's goal.
Interesting article. We might be at the point where computers become self aware and a good percentage of humans lose their individuality and become unthinking stimulus-response machines.
Libs are retarded and can’t pass a simple IQ test for machines.
“It is very difficult to tell the difference between a Social Justice Warrior and a bot program”
John, I hate to tell you this, but it’s not just the SJWs.
Society in general has embraced the PC-dhimmitude that fears giving offense. Whether you realize it or not, you and I and most everyone else self-censor so obsessively it’s amazing we can even answer the phone. When is the last time you used the “N” word (see what I mean?) in public discourse? How long did it take to go from “illegal alien” to “illegal immigrant” to “immigrant”? There are millions of other examples.
Physician heal thyself.
I do not think I ever imagined it would become so easy to irritate people. I like the idea that you should be able to take as much comfort in the enemies you make as the friends who surround you. I sent trhe article to my two sons intend to continue the tradition.
I’ve encountered a few of these nitwits. It’s never fun.
bump for later
I like to think of PC as groupthink done on purpose. Which brings up the question, why on earth would anyone want to do groupthink on purpose?! Do they imagine this isn’t going to get away from them and take on a life of its own? Which I suppose argues against failing the Turing test, at least from an aggregate standpoint. So I guess the point then really, of PC, is to reduce human thought to something sub-human and not capable of evidencing independence. Does groupthink qualify as an artificial intelligence I wonder? If so, and witch hunts, tulip mania, and the South Sea bubble are what’s in store, better be careful what you wish for!
This is my analysis of how this conditioning is accomplished in the public school system:
https://backyardfence.wordpress.com/2015/12/17/a-critique-of-critical-thinking/
Enjoy!
collectivists have degraded human thought and speech so much that machines are already better conversationalists. >>>>
collectively yes but individually not so.
Examples abound. Under communism one dared not be a recidivist, a revisionist, or a counter-revolutionary, at quite literally the cost of one's life. Nor is conservatism exempt: how many times do we read conformist accusations on FR that one is not a "true conservative"?
The issue is complicated somewhat in politics by the fact that reflexive refusal to adopt conformist attitudes is itself a form of conformism. Hence the contrarian: "the United States is always wrong" differs not one whit from "the United States is always right" and dances equally to the voice of authority, merely in the opposite direction. And is equally furious in denying it.