Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9

The accusations against Bill Clinton were dismissed by the media and then by the public in the 90s. The common perception of most people (not FReepers) is that ole Bill just loved to get him some women, mmmmmmm... mmmmmm...... mmmmmmmmmmmmm.

In a way, he is seen as the Democrat Party’s very own Hugh Hefner. They see nothing wrong with it. They even like him more because of it, consensual or not!

Hillary was just doing the obligatory Tammy Wynette. The public doesn’t care.

Hillary trying to play the woman card will appeal to the women who already support her no matter what Trump says. The rest will not care about the woman card no matter what Hillary says.

I, for one, don’t care. There are so many more important things this election than replaying the 1990’s news cycle.

The policies of Secretary of State Clinton have engulfed the entire world in terrorist turmoil, mass murder and geo-political instability. Play your woman card on that.


42 posted on 12/30/2015 2:35:09 PM PST by FerociousRabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FerociousRabbit

The Progressive approach to Bill Clinton was, and is, straight out of the “Great Man” principle. Namely that the personal foibles of “Great Men” need to be overlooked, excused and even enabled due to their contributions to history and the cause.

The person who summed this up best was that twit reporter who offered to strap on the “Presidential kneepads” and give Bill head for keeping abortion legal. Providing sexual favors being an appropriate “payment” for being able to effect abortion rights.

The same thing was true with the Kennedys. I remember going to college in the late 80’s in DC and observing attractive, Liberal female classmates being warned by other Liberals that the LAST place they should intern was in Teddy’s Senate office. Stuff about his “hot tub and cocaine” parties at his McLean mansion and a US Capitol “hideaway” straight out of Caligula. But nothing formal was ever done about any of it. It was all acceptable because the Liberal Lion of the Senate, the staunch defender of women’s causes, had ... needs ... that had tone served.


54 posted on 12/30/2015 2:57:22 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: FerociousRabbit
I, for one, don't care. There are so many more important things this election than replaying the 1990's news cycle.

That "1990's news cycle" that you disregard is the most public evidence of the continuum of Clinton criminality. We are faced with Hillary becoming the Democrat candidate in an election controlled by the press & local Democrat vote counters.

ALL BECAUSE people like you, "for one, don't care"!

Bribery by Tyson Foods via the Cattle Futures should have sent them both to prison, but people like you, "for one, don't care".

Whitewater real estate scam should have sent them both to prison, but people like you, "for one, don't care".

Travelgate should have sent them both to prison, but people like you, "for one, don't care".

700 FBI files should have sent them both to prison, but people like you, "for one, don't care".

Vince Foster's suicide/murder should have sent them both to prison, but people like you, "for one, don't care".

Do you begin to see a pattern?

Wink, wink, nod, nod because "it was only sex" or the usual political enrichment let both Clintons to (rightly) assume that they can get away with anything - murder, high treason, bribery in the millions by foreign governments.

Too bad Barney Fife wasn't around in Arkansas in the '70s to "nip it in the bud".

Or the people, like you, "for one, (did) care" and would have sent them both to prison long ago.

62 posted on 12/30/2015 5:38:44 PM PST by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson