with his father and Danielle in 2012:
This breaks my heart.
I guess I have mixed feelings. Thems the rules. I have requested exemptions and been denied so you move on. These rules have been fought over long and hard and in some ways make sense.
On the other hand if exemptions were as common as Obama did with Obamacare, this should get one.
Should he be given an exemption because of his exemplary service? I don’t know.
The purpose of the rule is to stop building in rural areas, thus the 20 acre rule. But all the 20 acre rule does, is stop rich people form building..................
Take out the service factor, would you give him an exemption? and would it be in the news?
Build where you want, how you want, get your friends to help defend the place. It truly is the American way. Too bad the nation is now so mortified of freedom that they celebrate the restrictions. It reminds me of my friends who smoke cigarettes, praising laws against smoking in bars. A majority of people will leave their beers and things behind and step outside for a smoke, and tell you “it really is the best thing”...... IDIOTS ..... Freedom means the bar owner can choose what he allows, patrons can choose what place they go, and a third party has no say in it. Yes, and that includes a liquor license.
I wonder what the percolation test was for that land. It has to be a septic tank and a well from the article. 1.5 acres is marginal for land with good percolation if it has a well on it.
The city around here changed the rules (which required 10 acres for a septic tank) down to one acre about 15 or 20 years ago. They have had nothing but problems with septic tanks polluting downstream homes in that area. Lots of lawsuits. They upped the acreage recently for new construction with septic tanks and wells. I think it is 5 acres now.
Keep in mind that septic tanks can get by with less land if the water is pumped in in a pipe, but it does not sound like that is the case here.
if some ragheads wanted a mosque there, it would be ok.