Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Eric in the Ozarks

“16 inch guns are primitive and slow to reload. Missiles would carry the day against an “Iowa.””

Nope. The Iowa’s have missile defense in the form of screening DD’s with standard missiles specifically for that, and the Iowa’s also have CIWS.

Then, for the rare missile that makes it through, one final surprise. Modern anti-ship missiles are designed to attack modern warships that are essentially unarmored. They have splinterproof Kevlar armor in spots. A modern missile has no ability to defeat 12 inches of the steel armor from WWII.
This armor is not just a flat plate, in a BB it is sloped, and built in depth with critical areas of the ship getting even more special treatment.

A modern antiship missile carries a 500 pound charge, and impacts often with less speed than an old AP battleship shell. And it isn’t a hardened penetrator. So of the very few that get through, 90% of modern antiship missiles will leave scorches and little damage.

Modern ships can be penetrated by a warthog all day long. An Iowa ain’t the Sheffield or a pissant modern cruiser. For extra fun, no surface combatant has an effective way to attack a battleship, and had better stay at least 20 miles away.


38 posted on 12/25/2015 12:42:48 AM PST by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

Our armor plate using Nickle steel was the best out there. Highly resistant to pretty much any shell fire.


44 posted on 12/25/2015 3:51:54 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRhino

The fear with the Iowas in the 1980s was an under-the-hull proximity torpedo hit. Create a big bubble of air, have it hit the keel at high speed creating both explosive impact damage AND more importantly rapidly lift the hull in a very small point would snap their backs, rupture all sorts of things and possibly detonate their magazines.


45 posted on 12/25/2015 4:34:22 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRhino

I saw the missile-updated Missouri a couple years ago while touring Pearl.
I don’t think they bothered to do this with the BB-61 after the turret explosion.

The sailing range of these BBs was limited by the switch from N6 to diesel after they were brought out under President Reagan.


46 posted on 12/25/2015 5:35:14 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRhino

Haha, must of been a terror to contend with back in the day. I’d of liked to see footage of the Bismarck battle. Too bad they didn’t have all that on camera.


47 posted on 12/25/2015 6:07:19 AM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson