If he had come clean, taken responsibility, and then done something proactive - like use his name and celebrity to oppose gambling addiction - he probably would be in a different position.
But he lied, came somewhat clean, then lied again, over and over, signed autographs at casino sport books, did commercials on TV where he mocked the HOF, etc.
Gambling almost brought the sport down in 1919. Juiced players are a different level of magnitude from canned outcomes.
He refuses to acknowledge the seriousness of what he did.
And to those who'd like to keep thinking Rose has been singled out for whatever nebulous reasons, there is but one question: Which portion of Rule 21(d) do they not comprehend?