I don't know about that, but I'm pretty sure there is some 'dog' in them.
I noticed that the article featured the names of the ‘heroic’ city attorneys that led this bold investigation, but didn’t bother to list the names of the offending restaurants.
Was the purpose to actually provide us with useful information to choose which restaurants provide quality products, or to convince us we need vast ever-vigilant bureaucracies to safeguard our delicate palates from the horrors of eating the wrong seafood?