Based on their *criteria*:
**single most influential person who*s *persona* and deeds (good or evil) have affected *the many*.....the largest number of people worldwide, the *winner* should be Al-Baghdadi. Meh.
This is from the journal whose subscriber base is down around 3.2 million, and ad dollars have taken a beating in print. Good riddance.
http://www.magazinedeathpool.com/
More of a pamphlet or brochure than a magazine.
There was a time I subscribed to both Time and Newsweek along with US News and World report along with a daily newspaper.
That was when I believed they were neutral observers.
I am not sure when I began to realize that their version of “truth” was not exactly what I believed was true. Eventually I gave up on all of them.
It was much later I discovered Rush, and then eventually the internet and many difference news sources. I can now get information from many sources and decide for myself.
Time Magazine has forgotten what it’s main purpose in life is (to sell advertisement). They think their main purpose is to support Liberals. Their falling circulation and advertisement revenue shows they are failing in both.