Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: skeptoid

A brazen effort to incrementally chip away at the medieval warming period, which period in and of itself provides sufficient variation to destroy Mann’s hockey stick.

Explain away the mwp, because people can’t forget it, and you can justify treating it as noise and not normal variation.

Of course they can’t explain the little ice age either, but they like to include it because it lowers the baseline and skews normal temperatures to look warmer.


35 posted on 12/07/2015 9:17:14 PM PST by BlueNgold (May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BlueNgold

Hear, hear!!


37 posted on 12/08/2015 9:19:33 AM PST by skeptoid (I'm a sucker for pulchritude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: BlueNgold; skeptoid; canuck_conservative; Paladin2; yarddog; Vendome; SunkenCiv; All

It is accepted by some that the Little Ice Age was correlated with a major decrease in sunspots. There were apparently 3 such incidents starting with the LIA called the Maunder Minimum, then the Sporer Minimum, and I forget the third one’s name. The article linked has a number of interesting comments. A popular theory is that as conditions changed they failed to adapt and use the kinds of foods that served the Inuit well. Also, it has been suggested that with cold, Atlantic storms increased and fewer ships came to Greenland. Some probably died, others might have been kidnapped, and finally some probably went back east.


46 posted on 12/13/2015 1:22:34 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson