Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

Lincoln’s “House Divided” speech


I would assume that this was not a one time speech? Can you support that?

It was said that Ronald Reagan gave essentially the same speech through out most of his political career?


150 posted on 11/24/2015 12:34:11 PM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: PeterPrinciple

Lincoln gave a whole lot of speeches. They’re all worth reading and absorbing, especially if you want to understand the background of the war.

I don’t recall any stump-like repetitive nature to them, either. They seemed fairly unique, well able in each case to stand up on their own.

Things were different then. Political speeches tended to run for hours.

Take a look at the Lincoln-Douglas debates for example. They went on for hours and hours, and were repeated many times in numerous locations.

These guys had to know their stuff.

The above is why, I think, that people were so shocked by the incredible brevity of perhaps the greatest speech in American history, Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address. (”The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here...”)

At that event, the main speaker was Edward Everett, a renowned orator. He spoke for several hours. Lincoln gave his immortal address in two minutes.

Afterwards, Everett famously told Lincoln that he wished he could have summed up the heart of the matter in two hours as well as he had done it in two minutes.


152 posted on 11/24/2015 12:47:47 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson