Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/20/2015 10:59:53 AM PST by Mellonkronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mellonkronos

While somewhat interesting the film is really a big bore. The film should have been cut by 50%.


2 posted on 11/20/2015 11:04:05 AM PST by DHerion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mellonkronos

nobody ever mentions the starchild. it even conflicts with the sequels 2010 and 2060, where dave bowman visits his mother in her nursing home, etc..it is a concept that has always been underplayed...

imagine looking up into the night sky and seeing a giant embryo...


7 posted on 11/20/2015 11:23:31 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mellonkronos
The First Transhumanist Film

Bollocks.

12 posted on 11/20/2015 11:50:28 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mellonkronos

Our high school Aerospace Science class went on a field trip to see 2001 when it was first released. Fantastic film, though some parts are a little drawn out - Kubrick was a genius IMHO.


14 posted on 11/20/2015 11:57:13 AM PST by dainbramaged (Get out of my country now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mellonkronos
...We know from Clarke's novel, written in conjunction with the film script...oh, somehow I missed the part about reading the novel to understand what the movie-thing was all about.....
24 posted on 11/20/2015 9:00:34 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson