Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Their R&D seems to be much better than our R&D.

Not as much corruption I guess.

1 posted on 11/08/2015 6:56:31 AM PST by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fella

“Their R&D seems to be much better than our R&D.

They are actually at war and we are not. War stimulates technological development. As near as I can determine, our technological progress has stalled under Obama. Like Hitler, he has decided to take the cheap route and rely on the old proven technology; the drones we have and guided bombs. (Germany had working jet prototypes but the propeller planes did just fine in Poland and they were cheap.)

Obama has no need to develop defensive equipment as it would cost money, be embarrassing if it failed, and it would only save US military lives, which is not his priority.


2 posted on 11/08/2015 7:02:37 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fella

Again, I want one. Wont even ask for two, even if you try and make me!


3 posted on 11/08/2015 7:14:53 AM PST by If You Want It Fixed - Fix It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fella

>>> Their R&D seems to be much better than our R&D.
Not as much corruption I guess. <<<

No H1b folks to sabotage the project and steal the tech?

That’s what’s going on here in the USA, but nobody’s noticed it yet.


4 posted on 11/08/2015 7:16:00 AM PST by JJ_Folderol (Just my opinion and only worth what you paid for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fella
Quite a game changer if Israel has a cheap, effective defense against the barrage of mortar rounds and cheap homemade rockets.

Stopping these attacks at the source, by taking out the launchers, is impractical sometimes. The Palis like to launch from innocent civilian areas then claim Israel's return fire was an "unprovoked attack on innocent victms".

6 posted on 11/08/2015 7:24:53 AM PST by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fella

Next will be a UAV that takes out Laser Iron Beams.


8 posted on 11/08/2015 7:34:15 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fella

My question is about the firing rate - this takes a LOT of power, and if it can only fire 2 or 3 times a minute then it isn’t going to be that effective. Any enemy could overwhelm the system with a dozen mortars or arty pieces. Of course, knocking out ANYTHING is a net positive, but the question is really whether it is cost-effective. The Iron Dome missiles cost $100,000 per shot ($50K per missile, and they launch 2 at each target to be as sure as possible of hitting it), whereas the target missiles cost a lot less. I hope that this system has a better ratio (i.e. that not too many lasers are needed to effectively cover a given area), and that they can later improve the range in a Mk. 2 version.


10 posted on 11/08/2015 8:40:02 AM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fella

Nice technology step forward. When any ground-breaking war technology is first introduced, it is not the ultimate weapon. It is in the field where experience can be gained, improvements identified and over time, continuous improvements make it into a valuable weapon.


13 posted on 11/08/2015 9:36:11 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson