Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: notdownwidems
You did read the part where I said I was not receiving social security benefits, didn't you?

Yes, I did. Did you notice my parenthetical expression acknowledging it?

To answer your question, I would be lad to accept a 16% or whatever other arbitrary percentage decrease you can name if and when I ever get any benefits, because x dollars - 16%is much better than $0, which is what we are going to get if these irresponsible thieves keep on as they are doing.

Actually, if nothing is changed -- you'll get more than $0.

Contrary to a lot of doomsayers: Once the Trust Fund is exhausted, Social Security must only reduce benefits to the level that can be sustained by the payroll taxes.

Currently, that is estimated to occur about 2034, and at that point benefits would have to be reduced 21%. The 16% reduction only if it were to be immediately applied to all current and future beneficiaries.

But, I will withdraw my previous comment: I applaud you for making that offer. You may be the first person that has done so, and I also salute you for it.

151 posted on 11/06/2015 12:28:37 PM PST by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: justlurking; All
Yes, I did. Did you notice my parenthetical expression acknowledging it?

I did notice it, after I had posted my rant; my apologies. Actually I would much prefer an out to the system altogether; if they would just stop deducting payroll taxes they can have all my previous contributions; just let me live in peace and prepare for my own retirement; don't need big brother to help me with that, thanks!
152 posted on 11/06/2015 12:56:35 PM PST by notdownwidems (Washington DC has become the enemy of free people everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson