The Disney worker was replaced by a contracted company which supposedly hired H1B workers. Of course, THAT doesn’t make for juicy writing, so generally is excluded from these stories.
Does that make it OK?
Same difference.
To everybody who has ever lost a job due to outsourcing to an outside company, it is a difficult thing to take, and I empathize with your feelings of betrayal. The lower bidder will generally win the contract, and even if you were an excellent performer in your job it was given to someone else. It has happened to me and to millions of others. I didn’t seek protectionist government policies but rather focused on increasing my own value in a competitive market. Where there is competition for the same resource someone will lose. It is possible to make yourself the resource that others compete to win, that’s where you put your self in the canary seat.
was replaced by a contracted company which supposedly hired H1B workers.
*******************
Just another layer of legal protection for Disney ... they get the cheaper H1b’s but the consultant company certifies that they (not Disney) have a lack of employees with the needed skills. This sounds like a problem best solved with a RICO suit. There is undeniable collusion to avoid legal requirements.
The Disney worker was replaced by a contracted company which supposedly hired H1B workers. Of course, THAT doesn’t make for juicy writing, so generally is excluded from these stories.
How is your comment relevant a story of US workers being replaced by foreigners who are only to work here if we lack the skills to fill the jobs.
It does not matter if it is a contractor to Disney using foreign workers to replace employed Americans in those jobs or if it is a Disney direct hire of foreigners to do work Americans are qualified to do. They are breaking the law.